Is it just for the United States to use military force to prevent the acquisition of nuclear weapons?

The complete resolution is:

It is just for the United States to use military force to prevent the acquisition of nuclear weapons by nations that pose a military threat.



Please help define terms and state your views supported with evidence. Thank you.Is it just for the United States to use military force to prevent the acquisition of nuclear weapons?Yes, if you mean a government that has sworn to try to destroy the western way of life. It's the humane approach!



Let me try to explain what happens if we don't reserve military force as a last resort. Let's say Ahmadinejad manages to enrich uranium to the level necessary for a bomb and then sells some of the enriched product to ??? The bin Ladin crowd for example.



Maybe they would be successful in structuring a bomb and detonating it in Boston, killing 600,000+ people and leveling the city. Each reactor has a measurable signature that can be tracked through it's product. It would be very easy for the US to figure out where the plutonium was produced... Iran in this example.



Just how do you think the USA would react to that? (Final Jeopardy music plays while you think...) That's right, goodbye Iran. Robots will have to go in one day to get the oil.



In conclusion, an insurgency to remove the threat before it goes thermalnuclear costs less lives and is therefore more humane.



Make no mistake, thinking that the US will sit back and tollerate a nuclear detonation on our soil would be a serious miscalculation.Is it just for the United States to use military force to prevent the acquisition of nuclear weapons?Nope. WE have them[and used them]. The russians do, the USSR did, Israel does, Pakistan does, the UK and France do as well, and dont forget China...ALOT of countries do. The thing with acquiring nuclear weapon is balance of power. Also.. IT will always be the biggest deterrent for it to not be used. Why do you think we used it? No one else had it. And with our BIGGEST enemy, the USSR that had them for the longest time, and it never being used, is proof that no one will.Is it just for the United States to use military force to prevent the acquisition of nuclear weapons?Has it occured to you, or anyone, that the United States is the only country to have dropped THE BOMB, not once, but twice. The theory of thinking that this 'balance of power' prevents the "bad guys" from using them is like saying, because I have a gun, no one will shoot me.

Let's also consider that the United States is the largest provider of weapons to these so called "bad guys", and haven't stopped their own nuclear programs, while they demand others not be allowed to have one. Just a few odd years ago, the United States was a primary supporter and supplier of Iran. While they also put Saddam Hussain in power.

Stopping anyone's nuclear program in no way prevents a biological attack, nor a chemical attack, and it certainly does not prevent the United States from murdering it's own citizens like it did on 9/11 as an excuse to start a war.

This would seem to indicate that it is the UNITED STATES themselves who are the REAL military threat to WORLD PEACE and it's own citizens. Using, or creating any excuse, to invade and murder people who are less able to defend themselves...they certainly haven't taken away the nukes from China, Britian, Russia, etc.

In the COMPLETE DEATH TOLL of Iraq, which has a higher portion of those deaths? Civilian or Military? Unarmed women and children or soldiers with guns?

The United States are nowhere near being just...that's just propoganda.Is it just for the United States to use military force to prevent the acquisition of nuclear weapons?
USA has the strongest and most technology advanced military force in the world and can beat all the military forces in the world combined. (Military spending more than 50% of world total military spending).



So they can do anything they want. Snub out any potential threat anyway they like it.



History are written by victors.